CitationBlackburn v. Dorta, 348 So. 2d 287 (Fla. May 5, 1977) Brief Fact Summary. Three cases where consolidated by the Supreme Court of Florida to determine if the doctrine of implied assumption of the risk was viable as an absolute bar to recovery subsequent to adoption of comparative negligence. Synopsis of Rule of Law. The concept of comparative negligence eliminates the need for the affirmative defense of implied assumption of the risk. ...
Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below:
PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from
The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™:
Choose Your Subscription:
--OR--
- INCLUDED Civil Procedure
- INCLUDED Constitutional Law
- INCLUDED Contracts Law
- INCLUDED Criminal Law
- INCLUDED Property Law
- INCLUDED Torts Law